Here's the actual scientific article - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231532#d1e578 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231

Here's the actual scientific article - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231532#d1e578 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.231532#d... I haven't yet read the whole thing, but on first impression, it seems to me that the authors started with the hypothesis that it's not an adaptation and then tried to find supporting evidence, rather than actively trying to disprove the adaptation hypothesis.