3 ms·
You seem to suggest there is some platonic ideal use of clojure and this isn't it. But this simply isn't the case. Just because the first version of clojure was
by panick21_ 3y ago
You seem to suggest there is some platonic ideal use of clojure and this isn't it. But this simply isn't the case. Just because the first version of clojure was on the JVM doesn't mean all other uses are somehow 'lesser'.
Why is simple, use the language you already know that has good libraries available for scripting.
- zilti 3y agoThe thing is that this - unlike ClojureJVM, ClojureScript, ClojureCLR - only acts as if it were Clojure, while not actually being it, by lacking some core features and having a out of technical necessity convoluted "pod" mechanism. We're using it at work, together with Clojure, it works just fine, but it is the weird sibling.