4 ms·
Of the ones you listed, consistency is the big downside for me. It seems like there's multiple options for everything in the Linux ecosystem. From the beginner
by satiric 3y ago
Of the ones you listed, consistency is the big downside for me. It seems like there's multiple options for everything in the Linux ecosystem. From the beginner questions (e.g., which distro), to the nerdy questions (e.g., systemd vs sysvinit), to the ones in between (e.g., vim vs emacs). I sometimes wonder if GNU Herd would have been better at this, since everything would be designed by the GNU folks for one unified ecosystem.
I don't think Valve will fix it TBH. They only care about Linux UX on their hardware, i.e. Steam Deck. I don't see why they would fund things like KDE, or features in the kernel beyond the ones that they need for their products to work. (Not that I think they're assholes for this; just that it's unfortunate)
- p_l 3y agoThey are very much upstreaming things a lot, in ways that support more than just their hardware, which results in general boost for everyone. They definitely could have done it differently and in cheaper ways (just look at every embedded platform). As for KDE, Steam Deck runs KDE.
- massysett 3y ago> I sometimes wonder if GNU Herd would have been better at this, since everything would be designed by the GNU folks for one unified ecosystem. You just invented *BSD.
- timeon 3y agoWhichBSD?
- p_l 3y agoConsidering Hurd is mentioned, I humbly nominate OSF/1
- satiric 3y agoWhich BSD has its own desktop environment? Which BSD has centralized, discoverable settings? (discoverable meaning I don't have to dig into man pages to figure out what to do). BSD is better but still doesn't go far enough IMO. FWIW, I have never needed to dig into Windows' help system or Google to figure out how to use Windows Settings or the old Control Panel.
- massysett 3y agoNone of them. But GNU does not have this either. For awhile GNOME was part of the GNU project, but isn't now, and even when it was, X was not a GNU project. GNU has this random assemblage of packages: https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html So add the Hurd to that, along with an actual distribution mechanism (not a trivial task), and what you get is something like a BSD.
- satiric 3y agoAh OK, I stand corrected. Looks like my pipe dream of getting a Unix derivative as unified as Windows stays unattainable then (although KDE Neon was pretty good last time I tried it, from a Settings point of view anyway)
- massysett 3y agoOh, not at all unattainable - a Unix derivative as unified as Windows is macOS. I've got a terminal and an Emacs running on my Mac right now. But a free software one? No - that's the point of this article: the free software desktop users aren't willing to put up the resources it would take to develop what you're seeking.
- internetter 3y agoValve does fund KDE