3 ms·
Will this allow Firefox to have extensions now that they’re not limited by WebKit? Or will Apple still axe that as a “third party App Store” or some bullshit?
by M3L0NM4N 3y ago
Will this allow Firefox to have extensions now that they’re not limited by WebKit? Or will Apple still axe that as a “third party App Store” or some bullshit?
- mcny 3y agoLooks like this is in the EU only --- Requirements To qualify for the entitlement, your app must: Be available on iOS in the European Union only Be a separate binary from any app that uses the system-provided web browser engine Not have the default browser entitlement [...] --- https://developer.apple.com/support/alternative-browser-engines https://developer.apple.com/support/alternative-browser-engi... Given that Congress is in a stalemate, I don't see this coming to the US anytime soon.
- olliebrkr 3y ago"only", so we'll likely start seeing multiple listings of the same app?
- saagarjha 3y agoYes.
- emayljames 3y agoCould California not maybe act sooner?
- charcircuit 3y agoOrion supports Firefox extensions on iOS while using webkit, so there is an existence proof that it's possible to at least have limited support for them.
- loadsas 3y agoThey do. But for example the ublock extensions shows always zero blocked ads. Maybe it's a misconfigurarion on my side? Looking forward to a real firefox on ios.
- Squarex 3y agono ublock origin is not working (yet?)
- saagarjha 3y agoOrion is almost certainly going to request the entitlement to ship a custom WebKit, in line with what they do on macOS. This might take a while, though.