3 ms·
Very simple: articulate new rules which cover the behavior, and publish them. You essentially argue for common law: an enormous corpus of precedents that is im
by varjag 3y ago
Very simple: articulate new rules which cover the behavior, and publish them.
You essentially argue for common law: an enormous corpus of precedents that is impossible to navigate without dedicated lawyers, is a pain to arbiter and still does not preclude injustice.
- hkt 3y agoTo continue the comparison, some of common law's shortcomings can be overcome with an entity like the UK's law commission, eg, rewriting statute (or the code of conduct) to incorporate changes based on new precedent. Which does appear to somewhat be what has happened.