4 ms·
> between 1,900 per cent and 6,300 per cent higher than industry has reported. Why are they relying on the industry to self report these?
by creativeSlumber 3y ago
> between 1,900 per cent and 6,300 per cent higher than industry has reported.
Why are they relying on the industry to self report these?
- markerz 3y agoSeems more like the standard used to measure emissions is inadequate. > Past monitoring has failed to capture the full scope of organic carbon pollution because it wasn’t looking at a diverse enough range of molecular sizes often associated with heavy oil and bitumen deposits. Such deposits are expected to account for 40 per cent of global oil production by 2040, the study found.
- astrodust 3y agoBecause Alberta, which translated into American is "Texas".
- sandworm101 3y agoAlberta politics today is like Texas in the 1990s. Freedom. Hatred of the national government. Denialism (climate/vaccinations/gravity etc). Pickup trucks. Guns. Oil. If someone says don't do something, a large portion of Albertans will do it out of spite. The only place I've every even heard of rolling coal in Canada was in northern Alberta, home of the oil sands. Typical example: in BC people turn on their head/taillights in bad weather. In Alberta, heck no. Lights don't come on until legally mandated at sunset. Freedom.
- actionfromafar 3y agoPardon my ignorance, but isn't that also Texas now?
- lukasm 3y agoTaxes is the most green state
- osigurdson 3y agoI think this is all red states, which is nearly half. These are not "niche" attitudes.
- sandworm101 3y agoNot really anymore. Texas cities are recently much more liberal and down to earth than thier extreemist hinterlands. The stereotype diminishes every year.