3 ms·
It seems more likely to me that ARIN is following the text of published policy, but Capital One found a way to interpret it that violates its spirit. My guess
by greyface- 3y ago
It seems more likely to me that ARIN is following the text of published policy, but Capital One found a way to interpret it that violates its spirit. My guess is that they're treating each customer debit/credit card as a serving site that qualifies for a /48. To address this, ARIN should fix the policy, not raise fees.
- Dagger2 3y agoIt's ARIN's job to call BS on BS justifications, otherwise they're not following the policy, they're following whatever they allow. "The purpose of a system is what the system does" and all. That's an interesting idea for how they justified it. There might be something like 4 billion active credit/debit cards in the US (but they probably weren't all issued by Capital One).