3 ms·

I don’t think that would be the case for Microsoft to retaliate, I suspect there might be a whole bunch of regulators just waiting this abuse of dominant positi

I don’t think that would be the case for Microsoft to retaliate, I suspect there might be a whole bunch of regulators just waiting this abuse of dominant position just to stop the spread of competition

tgma 3y ago
LOL. That would be naïve. They just have to retaliate in such a way that keeps plausible deniability with the regulator.
- lnxg33k1 3y ago
  To me it looks more like your is the naive point, you're talking like microsoft is a random guy in some basement, it's a huge company with a massive headcount, how do you deny when you can request internal communication or have potential whistleblowers? Looks surprising that after all the times regulators have fined/regulated these massive corps people still think that they can "act surprised/denying"
  - shiroiuma 3y ago
    Which regulators? "Regulators" in the US aren't going to do anything at all about Microsoft. Regulators in the EU may slap MS with some fines, but it'll just be a "cost of doing business" fine.
kragen 3y ago
lenovo is chinese, microsoft is usa
- lnxg33k1 3y ago
  And regulators usually don't regulate foreign companies? I am european so I was talking more about EU
- NoZebra120vClip 3y ago
  Lenovo is globalist, and Microsoft is globalist as well. Despite slightly different topologies, their globes intersect by a significant amount.
  - kragen 3y ago
    there is no way a whole bunch of us regulators are going to pounce on a us company for stopping the spread of competition from a chinese linux-installing laptop vendor, and if a bunch of chinese regulators pounce, it will not have a major impact on microsoft lnxg33k1's point that eu regulators might is well-taken, though
  - zitterbewegung 3y ago
    Yea I don’t think it’s totally a globalist thing it’s more like why pay the google / Microsoft tax and or their leverage and just put Linux on their machines. Dell also offered FreeDOS before .
- novolunt 3y ago
  [dead]

tgma 3y ago

LOL. That would be naïve. They just have to retaliate in such a way that keeps plausible deniability with the regulator.

lnxg33k1 3y ago
To me it looks more like your is the naive point, you're talking like microsoft is a random guy in some basement, it's a huge company with a massive headcount, how do you deny when you can request internal communication or have potential whistleblowers? Looks surprising that after all the times regulators have fined/regulated these massive corps people still think that they can "act surprised/denying"
- shiroiuma 3y ago
  Which regulators? "Regulators" in the US aren't going to do anything at all about Microsoft. Regulators in the EU may slap MS with some fines, but it'll just be a "cost of doing business" fine.

kragen 3y ago

lenovo is chinese, microsoft is usa

lnxg33k1 3y ago
And regulators usually don't regulate foreign companies? I am european so I was talking more about EU
NoZebra120vClip 3y ago
Lenovo is globalist, and Microsoft is globalist as well. Despite slightly different topologies, their globes intersect by a significant amount.
- kragen 3y ago
  there is no way a whole bunch of us regulators are going to pounce on a us company for stopping the spread of competition from a chinese linux-installing laptop vendor, and if a bunch of chinese regulators pounce, it will not have a major impact on microsoft lnxg33k1's point that eu regulators might is well-taken, though
- zitterbewegung 3y ago
  Yea I don’t think it’s totally a globalist thing it’s more like why pay the google / Microsoft tax and or their leverage and just put Linux on their machines. Dell also offered FreeDOS before .
novolunt 3y ago
[dead]