5 ms·
You 2 aren't in any disagreement. The whole point of all of these millions in legal fees is to even have the OPTION of an open model. Of course you'll always
by willsmith72 3y ago
You 2 aren't in any disagreement.
The whole point of all of these millions in legal fees is to even have the OPTION of an open model. Of course you'll always have walled garden option, that's apple's golden goose.
- halJordan 3y agoThere is a disagreement, the first poster clearly believes Apple even having a closed App Store is an infringement, even if he can not use it. And it's honestly almost gaslighting to pretend that the first poster isn't making that argument
- andersa 3y agoNo, this is not true. I do not care about what Apple does with their App Store. The point is they should not be allowed to insert themselves into a relationship between me trying to sell something and someone else trying to buy it from me directly. No cost to Apple exists, thus they should not be paid. It's really simple actually.