2 ms·
If MitM attacks are so rare, why bother encrypting your traffic in the first place? Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics, so why pr
by jbri 14y ago
If MitM attacks are so rare, why bother encrypting your traffic in the first place? Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics, so why protect against one but not the other?
Either go all the way on security, or be obvious about not having any. Appearing secure when in actuality you're not is the worst option.
- randallsquared 14y agoPacket-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics [...] Really? NSA boxes in AT&T (and presumably other) switching stations suggest that for US traffic it's extremely common.
- leephillips 14y ago'Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare"' I think they're pretty common, even for fun and recreation (http://codebutler.com/firesheep http://codebutler.com/firesheep). I know I could start reading people's emails in Starbucks with what's on my laptop now and the knowledge in my head, but if I wanted to mount a MITM attack I would need to do some research.