4 ms·
The problem is they're _also_ guilty of spinning "fake news". Yea, it's far more subtle, but "people left" for a reason. I think there is opportunity here, but
by unshavedyak 3y ago
The problem is they're _also_ guilty of spinning "fake news". Yea, it's far more subtle, but "people left" for a reason.
I think there is opportunity here, but i don't think it's back to the old ways. I imagine it would be some hybrid. A news source which aggressively documents and details sources. All opinions backed by a paper trail, etcetc.
I'd pay for that. Or something.. but i don't know what that looks like. These days it feels like everything has an agenda, and nothing (at least that i've seen) backs up claims/opinions/supposed-facts with the data fueling the statement.
- titzer 3y agoIt kind of doesn't matter when the median attention span is microseconds. What shames people is lies they told in the past coming back to bite them in the ass. But the public forgets the past, so when lies come back to bite people, they are just confused and angry and blame it on other people.
- unshavedyak 3y agoI'm kinda confused on the downvotes here - are we advocating for media conformance? What's the counter view to wanting media which sources more?