3 ms·
On one hand SQL has some oddities, on the other I'd rather there not be yet more different-but-equivalent ways to do things in SQL. I think the current state is
by hot_gril 3y ago
On one hand SQL has some oddities, on the other I'd rather there not be yet more different-but-equivalent ways to do things in SQL. I think the current state is good enough.
- hot_gril 3y agoThough I can see a strict subset of SQL being useful. First I'd axe the timestamp type in favor of always using timestamptz, cause those two things don't mean what most people think.