Maybe, but at least it is not immediately clear to me why scrapscript is better than SQL. The homepage of scrascript says: > Scrapscript is best understood

Maybe, but at least it is not immediately clear to me why scrapscript is better than SQL. The homepage of scrascript says: > Scrapscript is best understood through a few perspectives: > “it’s JSON with types and functions and hashed references” > “it’s tiny Haskell with extreme syntactic consistency” > “it’s a language with a weird IPFS thing” It later says: "Scrapscript solves the software sharability problem." None of the statements addresses the commonly recognized shortcomings of SQLs. In contrast, PRQL's value proposition is clear: it improves the readability and composability of SQL by offering a linear order of transformation through a pipelined structure. In addition, it is based on relational algebra so database professionals can still apply the theoretical framework that they understand and trust to master the language.