3 ms·
Total nonsense article. How does one talk about self driving and just gloss over the existence of Waymo?
by danielmarkbruce 3y ago
Total nonsense article.
How does one talk about self driving and just gloss over the existence of Waymo?
- __loam 3y agoEverything he says is relevant. Waymo is the exception, not the rule, and I'm sure even they are working hard to operationalize this stuff and make it actually cheaper than humans.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoThere are several irrelevant/incorrect statements. PyTorch doesn't need facebook to survive. Even if pytorch did disappear tomorrow, it's wrong to suggest that all folks competent at building/using models using pytorch would have a set of useless skills. No one who understood the situation would write that. The author clearly hasn't built a model or used any of the (several) ML libraries which all have similar constructs. The skill is to be able to keep straight in your head large tensors and their shape as they go through a bunch of operations - that's not framework dependent. "Risk intolerant" is a fancy term made up that is then used to paint every high value application as not a fit for the technology. There are many applications ( customer support, technical support, litigation research, mortgage underwriting, marketing copy, natural language queries of DBs) where LLMs are already being put to use and reducing the number of people required to do the job. This is written by a journalist who isn't actively involved in actually building or using the technology. They misunderstand things to the point of nonsensical conclusions.