I hear you. It's good to point out and hold accountable people in positions of power who are corrupt. My argument is that (to me) I doubt a leader being corrup

I hear you. It's good to point out and hold accountable people in positions of power who are corrupt. My argument is that (to me) I doubt a leader being corrupt is uncommon. Thus I think it's worth questioning why we are focusing so heavily on this one specific person versus a general story on corruption. For instance, does someone have an agenda against her identity or political views? That definitely doesn't exonerate her, but it's worth sensing if we the public are having our attention focused in a certain way in service of someone's agenda.