3 ms·
I agree with this, but so few people seem to like it. International travel is such a luxury and costs so much carbon. It's my goto example of something I would
by losvedir 3y ago
I agree with this, but so few people seem to like it. International travel is such a luxury and costs so much carbon. It's my goto example of something I would outlaw since it doesn't affect me, and there's no "real" reason for it. Of course, my libertarian sensibilities don't let me actually advocate for it, but I think about it when people want to outlaw marijuana, abortion, drinking, cars, guns, or whatever activity people other than themselves want to participate in. It's too easy to see the costs and not the benefits when it's someone else's activity.
But I really do think we'd be better off of more people voluntarily explored around their own home rather than taking far off vacations. Having lived in several countries and traveled to many more in my younger days (yes, I know, I'm a hypocrite), I don't find short travel visits to really help understand other cultures in any meaningful way like people like to claim. Extended visits or living there for several months or years does non-trivially change your perspective, though. As long as the place is substantially different and you make real connections with people.
- angra_mainyu 3y agoO_O Why in the world would you ever ban international travel???? Out of all the opinions I've read on HN, that must be the most insane one.... As someone who basically lives the lifestyle of a digital nomad, and has been internationally traveling since I was a kid, I think it's the one thing people should do more of.
- tonyedgecombe 3y ago>I agree with this, but so few people seem to like it. You won't see many adverts or travel programs on TV suggesting you go for a ten mile hike starting from your front door. Vast amounts of money are being spent to encourage you to get on a plane and 'explore the world'.