> First they were not enslaved. Second, it wasn't for centuries. Raj was heavily decentralized with local autonomous governance over much of its territory That

> First they were not enslaved. Second, it wasn't for centuries. Raj was heavily decentralized with local autonomous governance over much of its territory That is patently false. My ancestral family had owned land in what is present day Bihar going back to reign of Akbar. Their land was given to an Englishman by the British Raj and my ancestors became laborers on their own land and they were displaced and scattered in poverty. So fuck off with your whitewashing.