3 ms·
Alternative is the wrong question, I think. You should* assume the wireless connection itself is compromised and use an extra layer, like wireguard. *Assuming
by Retr0id 3y ago
Alternative is the wrong question, I think.
You should* assume the wireless connection itself is compromised and use an extra layer, like wireguard.
*Assuming this makes sense within your threat model. It's not something I think I should care about much, personally. Everything important I do goes over https anyway.
- dale_glass 3y agoBut that shouldn't be necessary. WiFi itself should be doing whatever wireguard adds to this setup.
- Retr0id 3y agoIt shouldn't be necessary, yet WiFi continues to show that it is.