There is also a more dire consequence as both scientists and developers are eager to develop these silly quantitative "dossiers" on people. Like here (unfortuna

There is also a more dire consequence as both scientists and developers are eager to develop these silly quantitative "dossiers" on people. Like here (unfortunately not OA) they have four sliders: extrovert-introvert, sensing-intuition, thinking-feeling, and judging-perceiving, none of which are probably based on anything sustainable: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1071581920300392 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S10715... Having said that, I do not deny the usefulness of "personas" for prototyping and developing "digital humans", NPCs, or whatever (i.e., not real people nor their "digital twins").