3 ms·
It doesn't. I would like to add, there's plenty of examples, some in math (e.g. geometry) playing out over >1000 years and dozens of generations, of the same h
by candiodari 3y ago
It doesn't.
I would like to add, there's plenty of examples, some in math (e.g. geometry) playing out over >1000 years and dozens of generations, of the same happening in humans.
That said, for both humans and this kind of LLMs, it does appear to improve performance, certainly in the near term.
- starbugs 3y agoCertainly there’s this problem in many areas. I was just wondering how big of a deal that might be in this case. Just had another of those experiences with GPT4 where it goes into a contradictory loop it cannot recover from. It seems there might be a big difference between long term cycles and short term severe degradation as in inbreeding and this paper‘s abstract sounded a bit like that to me. If the results indicate improved performance, then it doesn’t seem to be that big of a deal (yet?). Thanks for the explanation!