2 ms·

I get your point, but I don't agree. Following the privacy example, I'm not in favor of privacy just because bad actors could steal data from a company DB. I su

I get your point, but I don't agree. Following the privacy example, I'm not in favor of privacy just because bad actors could steal data from a company DB. I support privacy (and privacy regulations) because regular companies misbehave with that data. They have incentives to do so, they did it and continue to do it if they can. Reduce data theft risks is the cherry on the cake.

palata 3y ago
> I'm not in favor of privacy just because bad actors could steal data from a company DB. I support privacy (and privacy regulations) because regular companies misbehave with that data. I don't get that. So you want to prevent regular companies from abusing your data, but you don't mind so much about bad actors abusing it? Presumably bad actors have an incentive to hurt you, whereas regular companies have an incentive to make more profit (and hurting you is a collateral damage). I mean, if we can't agree on the fact that having any group (governmental or not) out there have access to some IA trained on all the data of everybody is a national security risk for pretty much everybody, I don't think we can go any further in this discussion. We'll just have to agree to disagree :-).