3 ms·
They are "Bodacious New Assumptions", in the words of Neal Koblitz: https://www.ams.org/notices/201003/rtx100300357p.pdf https://www.ams.org/notices/201003/rtx
by crotchfire 3y ago
They are "Bodacious New Assumptions", in the words of Neal Koblitz:
https://www.ams.org/notices/201003/rtx100300357p.pdf https://www.ams.org/notices/201003/rtx100300357p.pdf
- ykonstant 3y agoI submitted this paper before, but it did not get any eyeballs; I am submitting it again because I am genuinely amused by that classic debate between Koblitz and the applied cryptographers. Personally, I think both sides have their merits, but Koblitz tends to overstate his case by far. The paper is a really good (and fun) read, though.
- matthewdgreen 3y agoWe've moved on to much more exciting new assumptions in the 14 years since that was written. Pairing-related assumptions are practically respectable now.