> but there's been a lot of wrangling over the exact definition of "commercial." That's disturbing since the definition should be trivial! If I publish a libr

> but there's been a lot of wrangling over the exact definition of "commercial." That's disturbing since the definition should be trivial! If I publish a library (whether open source or not, doesn't really matter) and charge you money to use it in your product, that's commercial. I'm happy to take the liability (and will of course charge you enough money to make it worth it to me). If I throw out some code on github but you're not paying me, that's obviously not commercial.