> We, as a society can't tighten the bolts on plane doors. And yet planes are the single safest places you can be at any given time. Even on a 737-NG you're fa

> We, as a society can't tighten the bolts on plane doors. And yet planes are the single safest places you can be at any given time. Even on a 737-NG you're far more likely to die driving to/from the airport than during the flight. I would strongly suggest rethinking how you evaluate and manage tail risk. > Or we can start recycling it and running breeder reactors (and they are dangerous and have the down sides, typically they dont generate much power). I'm not going to get into it with you because this is just gish gallop, but no, they do not generate less power than conventional reactors. They require dramatically less fuel, several orders of magnitude. Some of them even produce more fuel than they consume. They're not really used only because the cost of Uranium is about $0.005/kWh and there's plenty of it, so there's no need for breeder reactors. I refer you once again to Brandolini's law. Pretty much everything you claim is wrong and easily disproven with a quick Google search. Don't facts get in the way of a good narrative, I guess.