4 ms·
They could have drank it for free or for minimal tax investment but now they have to give money to Nestle to do so while also polluting the planet with plastic
by alan-hn 3y ago
They could have drank it for free or for minimal tax investment but now they have to give money to Nestle to do so while also polluting the planet with plastic bottles
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> now they have to give money to Nestle to do so while also polluting the planet with plastic bottles Very few people have to drink Nestle’s products.
- earthling8118 3y agoThey do if they want to drink their water, which was taken.
- alan-hn 3y agohttps://www.theguardian.com/global/2018/oct/04/ontario-six-nations-nestle-running-water https://www.theguardian.com/global/2018/oct/04/ontario-six-n...
- AnimalMuppet 3y agoWhat argument are we having? If people would drink the water out of the tap, or drink it out of a Nestle bottle, they're drinking the same amount of water. Bottled water may be inefficient of other resources, may cause pollution, but it doesn't waste water.
- nerdbert 3y agoAccording to this: https://foodprint.org/blog/plastic-water-bottle/ https://foodprint.org/blog/plastic-water-bottle/ it costs about 5 liters of water to make one plastic bottle, so based on that, yes, it wastes a massive amount of water.