3 ms·
Again, fair use concerns the production of copyrighted works, it has nothing to do with the training. If this was the case, every person who could draw a batman
by Workaccount2 3y ago
Again, fair use concerns the production of copyrighted works, it has nothing to do with the training. If this was the case, every person who could draw a batman symbol from memory would be in violation of copyright.
"Using copyrighted works for monetary gain" refers to using art itself as the product. Knowing what Apple's logo is and making a logo in that style is not a violation of copyright. However using Apple's logo (or something strikingly close) is a violation.
The reason this is muddied is because legally artists don't really have a leg to stand on for "my art cannot be trained on by a computer" whereas they do have strong legal precedent (and actual laws) for "my art cannot be reproduced by a computer".
- leereeves 3y ago> fair use concerns the production of copyrighted works, it has nothing to do with the training Training is the "production" of a derivative work (a model) based on the training data. AI companies claim that this is covered by fair use, but this is simply a claim that has not yet been tested in court. And even if courts rule in favor of the AI companies, it sounds likely (based on what I've read) that Congress will soon rewrite the law to support the artists' position.