3 ms·
> It doubt it'll ever be argued for doorbells. Security cams, that's another story. Since the camera in the "doorbell" is recording continuously I highly doubt
by jsiepkes 3y ago
> It doubt it'll ever be argued for doorbells. Security cams, that's another story.
Since the camera in the "doorbell" is recording continuously I highly doubt it's anything else then a (security) camera in the eyes of the law. I highly doubt a little button on it which makes it do "ding-dong" changes anything about that.
- brnt 3y agoThe point of the device is to enable the owner to see who's at the door. Any other ability (seeing far outside of the zone right at your door) seems to me to not be the purpose of the device, but a side effect that's therefore not legitimate.