3 ms·

So the argument against not implementing it is... it's not implemented everywhere?

• hot_gril 3y ago
  It's this classic: https://xkcd.com/927/ https://xkcd.com/927/ There's already ID.me. Why add a new thing?
  • toomuchtodo 3y ago
    Because ID.me is a for profit company, and Login.gov is accountable to citizens as a GSA product. We swap out suboptimal solutions for more optimal solutions as the situation dictates.
    • hot_gril 3y ago
      I get the desire to upgrade, and I'm guessing there's a good reason the ID.me logins can't be migrated to Login.gov. But it's very rare and unsettling for login method and creds to change on a site. I've pretty much only seen that on govt websites... and botched Microsoft acquisitions. So there should be a high bar for this, and I hope Login.gov is really the last time.
      • toomuchtodo 3y ago
        > So there should be a high bar for this, and I hope Login.gov is really the last time. Me too.
  • esbranson 3y ago
    Because the part of ID.me that says > I accept the ID.me Terms of Service and Privacy Policy * I absolutely do not and will not. Their terms are a load of BS. Horrible terms, horrible company.