4 ms·
HDR video playback in the browser is pretty unreliable unless you're on a Mac.
by kevingadd 3y ago
HDR video playback in the browser is pretty unreliable unless you're on a Mac.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ffsm8 3y agoIt's also pretty unreliable on Mac too... It's more reliable then on linux though, and windows has been doing "auto HDR" for videos for years, so kinda hard to tell when something is HDR or not there.
- devwastaken 3y agoHDR through YouTube appears to work fine even on my non HDR certified HDR monitor.
- zamadatix 3y agoIn what way? I've been doing it without issue on PC longer than I've even owned a Mac.
- jiggawatts 3y agoFirefox has zero HDR support, as an example.
- zamadatix 3y agoThe product is only for Chromium based browsers on Windows so surely there's no harm in enabling the product video for that combo too, no?
- blackoil 3y agoThat would be true on Mac also?
- zamadatix 3y agoFirefox supports HDR video output on Mac since release 100.
- jiggawatts 3y agoWhat grinds my gears is that HDR output in a lot of software is "Mac only", even though Windows supports HDR video output just fine, and has had support for wide-color and HDR since Vista! E.g.: DaVinci Resolve has HDR capable only in its Mac version. Similarly, generating a Dolby Vision file is basically impossible on Windows. "Just buy a Mac" seems to be the best and most practical guidance I've seen for HDR workflows...
- rado 3y agoFF on Mac shows HDR on full screen only, how strange.