5 ms·
They are fake. Ultimately it’s not recovering lost detail, it’s making shit up
by deergomoo 3y ago
They are fake. Ultimately it’s not recovering lost detail, it’s making shit up
- nomel 3y agoI don't think making things up is the problem, it's if it's believable. If it's indistinguishable to a viewer, then who cares. I never would have thought the HDR of the clouds was "made up".
- SirMaster 3y agoMaybe I'm odd, but a big part of art to me is seeing things how the creator intended it to be seen. So I calibrate all my media consumption displays etc. I could never see myself using some automated SDR -> HDR conversion like this. Even if it looks natural, it doesn't look like it was supposed to, and I want to see it how it was supposed to look.
- nomel 3y agoI would use it on every single video I've ever made myself, because intent had nothing to do with how my videos look. They were made with then best camera I had available, and HDR has only been available relatively recently. This is a tool that I want to use. If nobody can tell I used it, that's a good thing for me. If you don't want to use it, then nobody is making you.
- UberFly 3y ago"I don't think making things up is the problem, it's if it's believable" Depends of course if it's being passed off as reality. Slippery slope and all.
- zeusk 3y agoThese remind me of the Samsung debacle about recognizing moon and emplacing a high quality texture of it into the image shot by camera.
- 4d4m 3y agoExactly. This is akin to upscaling or frame rate interpolation. No consumers want this, they turn it off in settings.