4 ms·
Let's hope education indivualizes to the need and talents of the individual partially via software. ChatGPT is my hope here. 15% failure rate is optimal for le
by testless 3y ago
Let's hope education indivualizes to the need and talents of the individual partially via software. ChatGPT is my hope here.
15% failure rate is optimal for learning
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12552-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12552-4
- liendolucas 3y agoSeriously? Oh god, please no. We need less of all that BS. People are thinking that are being "tutored" by AI, when in fact is just the output of a number crunching program. Reading books will get you way way closer to solid knowledge than the output crap of this so called "AI".
- vacuity 3y agoI don't think such an attitude is warranted. While I'm skeptical about the potential of LLMs as AGI (whatever that means), being able to summarize subjects and even come up with test questions can be very valuable for learning. I am concerned about the confabulation aspect, though. I wonder if there could be a uncertainty metric for that.
- testless 3y agoHappy to disagree here. I am hopeful that students get apps which provide them with - fast feedback loops - better adjustment to their learning speed - more patience - gamification - oppurtunity to ask endless questions Of course, only as an addition to the current mix. For math problems, this will be easier than for other contexts. I like text books for pop science or really hard things - like university level education. But I am surprised to see them as an option for basic education.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- CamperBob2 3y agoYou're making a serious mistake. If you're trying to learn something new, even in math or science, GPT4 is nothing less than a superpower. The process of learning when to trust it and when not to is learning.