4 ms·
If we pay them more, it's clearly wasteful. If we pay them less, do we expect better results?
by flerchin 3y ago
If we pay them more, it's clearly wasteful. If we pay them less, do we expect better results?
- _ea1k 3y agoIn the most recent quarter, Chargepoint had $367M in cash and cash equivalents. These large compensation packages suck a surprising amount of working capital out of businesses that already do not have huge runways. I'd expect better results if they focused on saving cash and building the business in a lower cost manner. They are early stage businesses and losses are expected, but they need to focus on the long term and long term compensation plans.
- rightbyte 3y agoHigher profits is better results, so I guess yes?
- JohnFen 3y ago> If we pay them less, do we expect better results? Sometimes, yes. Not speaking about the charging field specifically, but in general there seems to be a compensation level past which you begin to attract less desirable candidates.
- _ea1k 3y agoTo some extent, we've developed a system that rewards people for being able to pump the stock. It isn't always a bad thing, but it seems to be going pretty badly for most SPACs.