2 ms·
> As for "rude, annoying, unnecessary, etc." that's in the eye of the beholder. An article can't inherently have any of those properties; those describe reactio
by subjectsigma 3y ago
> As for "rude, annoying, unnecessary, etc." that's in the eye of the beholder. An article can't inherently have any of those properties; those describe reactions a reader might have to the article
> I don't know what "weird and problematic" might mean
I think it’s time to stop reading so much on the Internet when you seemingly can’t grapple with common, everyday words
> My capitalization of Black and non-capitalization of white are legacies you can blame on my age
This is so subtly misleading I’m seriously impressed. That you intentionally miss the point while making it seem completely reasonable? Wow.
You know exactly why what you said isn’t true, but I bet the drive-by reader unfamiliar with the situation isn’t and would take this comment in stride. Your own articles point to this writing style as “a new change” which is driven explicitly by CRT advocates within the past few years. But your mention of “my age” and “a long time ago” is meant to carefully deflect away from that, and make it seem like a reasonable status quo that has nothing to do with politics!
“Hey, I’m just some normal dude with no agenda whatsoever, and this crazy guy is just commenting all this super mean stuff for no reason.” Never mind the fact that your posts are clearly biased a certain way, half of what you say is intentionally misleading (or even just wrong), and what I am saying is completely bog-standard for HN in terms of etiquette. The perfect gaslight!
You should come work for the government, you’d be right at home here.
- gregjor 3y agoI presented some facts about demographics, and my opinion about what the curtains article intended. You presented innuendo and speculation about my motives and personality, concluding I have a leftist agenda, so subtly deployed that I'm gaslighting here in public. If I actually intended a veiled American leftist agenda in my choice of words I would have used African-American or BIPOC, don't you think? My use of "Black" to contrast with the article's use of "white," dashed off in a comment thread that will influence no one, must mean something, and I have to admire your determination to dig through the layers of obfuscation I cleverly laid on. I could try to dig up common usage from the '70s, when I learned to write in school, and when "Black" got capitalized and I got told by teachers (Americans, and leftists, no doubt) to write it that way. Or maybe I misremember -- that was decades ago, after all, and capitalization of words I rarely had occasion to write or think carefully about might have got mixed up in my head. These days someone with an actual leftist political agenda trolling HN comments would write BIPOC, but I don't want to spoil your conspiracy. My children sometimes try to correct my usage so I don't use words I learned in my youth and embarrass myself, or offend someone, or trigger amateur semioticians I encounter online. Here we are, with you accusing me of promoting a leftist agenda after I started arguing in this thread that the article about curtains doesn't use "white" in a racist sense, and that Americans aren't any more racist than anyone else. Kind of an odd way to argue what you accuse me of, but honestly you lost me a while back, and now you're just engaging in elder abuse. Thanks for the analysis and careful parsing. I'll circle back to my original point: the article has nothing to do with race, it's about curtains (or lack of) as a class status display. The authors of the almost tongue-in-cheek article carelessly chose a neighborhood they could refer to as "white" so people like me could spread out on the internet with our leftist biased gaslighting in order to... I don't know, you lost me somewhere, I'm not sure what I was trying to accomplish, but I'm sure you can tell me.
- subjectsigma 3y agoI’m going to get this comment framed. It’s beautiful.