So the story must be a lie because it advances a political narrative that you disagree with? You don't want AI legislation, so stories about harms of AI must be

So the story must be a lie because it advances a political narrative that you disagree with? You don't want AI legislation, so stories about harms of AI must be false? I've never seen such a blatant example of someone identifying their own confirmation bias, then using that confirmation bias as a reason to reject evidence.