3 ms·
So because no major country has solved this problem (except hungry which doesnt count because... reasons) then you oppose doing anything more than what has alre
by goodSteveramos 3y ago
So because no major country has solved this problem (except hungry which doesnt count because... reasons) then you oppose doing anything more than what has already been tried? Could that argument be used to oppose climate change action? Or literally any problem? You’re argument is logically invalid.
- michael1999 3y agoI oppose nothing, except your sloppy claim that "nothing" has been tried. Lots of things have been tried, and they failed. 40 years of failure from Seoul to San Francisco. That's not the same as not trying. Please, enlighten me on your plan to raise birth rates.