4 ms·
Assuming these papers are at the boundary of human knowledge, what would these AIs be trained on? How much authority should rest on an LLM reporting that, stati
by MontagFTB 3y ago
Assuming these papers are at the boundary of human knowledge, what would these AIs be trained on? How much authority should rest on an LLM reporting that, statistically, the paper’s tokens appear to match up with that trained model?
- mistermann 3y agoAn AI that can execute (all forms of) logic perfectly seems like an obviously useful approach since it is largely (entirely?) domain agnostic, and can fill the gap humans are not able to for cultural reasons. In my experiments, GPT-4 is already extremely capable in this regard.
- pvaldes 3y ago"More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record". Nature 12/12/2023 [1] Are we training AI on this fake papers also? How do the AI companies would remove a fake claim after it is included as true on AI models when popularity depends on how much boring is a theme? Until the last years, I never had seen so many papers that claim flamboyant new scientific discoveries that are counterintuitive, against the logic, or directly don't make any sense. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8