You can read the proposed text of the regulation at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5T8VChK8fSh3wUiYtRVOKIi9oIcAF/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5

You can read the proposed text of the regulation at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5T8VChK8fSh3wUiYtRVOKIi9oIcAF/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xfN5T8VChK8fSh3wUiYtRVOKIi9... in the rather awkward format of a four-column diff, paginated and converted to PDF. From what I've read, I don't really know what I think of it. Some parts of it are clearly reasonable - like limitations on CCTV facial recognition. The lower requirements placed on open models are also welcome. On the other hand, several times I read paragraphs that sounded like they were going to decisively settle issues like using copyrighted training material, only for the paragraph to end with something like "unless relevant copyright exceptions and limitations apply" or "without prejudice to" which seems to... just kinda leave the questions open. Such issues are complicated, though, and some people might find it reassuring there hasn't been a rush to decide either way.