4 ms·

Why would Youtube care to police bad actors? They are taking this money directly to their quarterly revenue.

ravenstine 3y ago
The only reason I can think of is so they can keep up their "we need to police bad actors" image necessary to maintain the moral high ground when they mistreat creators for the sake of sanitizing their platform.
phailhaus 3y ago
Creators don't want scam ads on their videos. It hurts YouTube's image, which hurts their bottom line.
- Mordisquitos 3y ago
  You would need a mass exodus of top YouTube creators to make the slightest dent on YouTube's bottom line. Meanwhile, any top YouTube creator leaving YouTube (to what alternative?) isn't hurting his or her bottom line, but rather nuking it from orbit.
  - carlosjobim 3y ago
    You're making it out to be a decision, but it's not. Creators can upload their content on several platforms and collect revenue from all.
    - BuyMyBitcoins 3y ago
      Just because they can collect revenue from other platforms doesn’t mean it will be sufficient or anywhere near what they were getting at YouTube.
      - fsflover 3y ago
        The act of publishing on PeerTube together with Youtube (or even one day earlier!) can be a good protest already in itself.
      - carlosjobim 3y ago
        Of course not, but it is a hedge against any decrease in revenue from YouTube, as speculated here. A hedge that doesn't cost anything.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - Mordisquitos 3y ago
      In that case the effect on YouTube's bottom line would be even smaller, if any. Creators posting their videos on other platforms would have a negligible to no effect on YouTube, given that it would remain the default (read "only") video platform for the overwhelming majority of the viewing public. A creator announcing "You may also see my videos on DailyMotion/Vimeo/Twitch/PeerTube/wherever" would simply be irrelevant to their mass audience, who would react anywhere between "Ok, whatever" to "I don't know what that means, ignore".
  - phailhaus 3y ago
    It's not a sudden mass exodus they care about, but a slow decline in their brand's perception for users. Scam ads make YouTube look shady.
- coffeebeqn 3y ago
  There is not really anywhere for the creators to go so they don’t really have any leverage. If you’re mad at YouTube you can go to an alternative and get 100-1000x less traffic and revenue. And some other obnoxious creator will take your spot on YouTube immediately
  - phailhaus 3y ago
    YouTube still has an brand image to uphold for users. Scam ads make it look cheap.
ToucanLoucan 3y ago
Hold YouTube responsible for the content of their advertising. If they advertise scams and people end up scammed, IMO, they should be held legally culpable for that. They played a role that they were paid for.

The only reason I can think of is so they can keep up their "we need to police bad actors" image necessary to maintain the moral high ground when they mistreat creators for the sake of sanitizing their platform.

phailhaus 3y ago

Creators don't want scam ads on their videos. It hurts YouTube's image, which hurts their bottom line.

Mordisquitos 3y ago
You would need a mass exodus of top YouTube creators to make the slightest dent on YouTube's bottom line. Meanwhile, any top YouTube creator leaving YouTube (to what alternative?) isn't hurting his or her bottom line, but rather nuking it from orbit.
- carlosjobim 3y ago
  You're making it out to be a decision, but it's not. Creators can upload their content on several platforms and collect revenue from all.
  - BuyMyBitcoins 3y ago
    Just because they can collect revenue from other platforms doesn’t mean it will be sufficient or anywhere near what they were getting at YouTube.
    - fsflover 3y ago
      The act of publishing on PeerTube together with Youtube (or even one day earlier!) can be a good protest already in itself.
    - carlosjobim 3y ago
      Of course not, but it is a hedge against any decrease in revenue from YouTube, as speculated here. A hedge that doesn't cost anything.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - Mordisquitos 3y ago
    In that case the effect on YouTube's bottom line would be even smaller, if any. Creators posting their videos on other platforms would have a negligible to no effect on YouTube, given that it would remain the default (read "only") video platform for the overwhelming majority of the viewing public. A creator announcing "You may also see my videos on DailyMotion/Vimeo/Twitch/PeerTube/wherever" would simply be irrelevant to their mass audience, who would react anywhere between "Ok, whatever" to "I don't know what that means, ignore".
- phailhaus 3y ago
  It's not a sudden mass exodus they care about, but a slow decline in their brand's perception for users. Scam ads make YouTube look shady.
coffeebeqn 3y ago
There is not really anywhere for the creators to go so they don’t really have any leverage. If you’re mad at YouTube you can go to an alternative and get 100-1000x less traffic and revenue. And some other obnoxious creator will take your spot on YouTube immediately
- phailhaus 3y ago
  YouTube still has an brand image to uphold for users. Scam ads make it look cheap.

ToucanLoucan 3y ago

Hold YouTube responsible for the content of their advertising. If they advertise scams and people end up scammed, IMO, they should be held legally culpable for that. They played a role that they were paid for.