3 ms·
The existence of nothing is equivalent to the existence of everything; neither can exist without the other since their respective definitions can only be expres
by ice_man 18y ago
The existence of nothing is equivalent to the existence of everything; neither can exist without the other since their respective definitions can only be expressed in relation (as a negation) of the other.
Both existence and a lack thereof are a part of the one same entity.
This entity mirrors itself infinitely both in "space" and in "time".
It mirrors itself in "time" by alternating between the states of existence and a lack thereof.
It mirrors itself in "space" exponentially by necessarily drawing a border around itself because the very existence of both existence and a lack thereof must give rise to a lack of existence and a lack thereof, if and only if it is to adhere to its own rule, to which it must by its own definition, which itself must exist by definition in the first paragraph.
This process of progressively expanding the "borders" of existence continues ad infinitum and gives rise to what we know as reality.
As depicted in the following moving picture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH45ffITujI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH45ffITujI