4 ms·

When you are able to log in, you then see who are related to you as well. I believe the news sites use those inflated numbers to make it more dramatic.

AlecSchueler 3y ago
> use those inflated numbers to make it [clear how serious it actually was].
- dmurray 3y ago
  They already release the 7 million people's data - to the same extent the hackers got it - to anyone who manages to upload a sufficiently similar genome. There's no additional data privacy concern in releasing it to hackers or Equifax or the FBI or 4chan or the Washington Post. 23andMe limit access to it for commercial reasons, not privacy ones.
  - wrasee 3y ago
    But you only have one genome, so you will only ever see a very small subset of that 7 million (I’m assuming that’s how it works, I’ve never used the service). Now you have access to 7 million records at the same time, which is much more powerful in terms of what you can do with that data.
    - dmurray 3y ago
      More powerful, but mostly you can do good things, like genealogical research, not bad things, like identity fraud or credit card theft (which you could do if you compromised the 7 million accounts individually). It's better for the world that that kind of aggregate data is public where anyone can use it, rather than exploited by 23andMe or sold only through data brokers.
sersi 3y ago
Ah, but then it's not like you get all of the data, just the names that are often fake anyway no? I mean I don't know anyone who used 23 and me under their real name.
- bookofjoe 3y ago
  >Ah, but then it's not like you get all of the data, just the names that are often fake anyway no? I would bet that an overwhelming majority of 23 and me users do so under their real names. I would bet that an overwhelming majority of HN users who use 23 and me do not do so under their real names.
  - sersi 3y ago
    You might be right but even my non-technical 50 years old friend who decided to use 23 and me with her sister to see if they shared the same father, did it with a fake name.

AlecSchueler 3y ago

> use those inflated numbers to make it [clear how serious it actually was].

dmurray 3y ago
They already release the 7 million people's data - to the same extent the hackers got it - to anyone who manages to upload a sufficiently similar genome. There's no additional data privacy concern in releasing it to hackers or Equifax or the FBI or 4chan or the Washington Post. 23andMe limit access to it for commercial reasons, not privacy ones.
- wrasee 3y ago
  But you only have one genome, so you will only ever see a very small subset of that 7 million (I’m assuming that’s how it works, I’ve never used the service). Now you have access to 7 million records at the same time, which is much more powerful in terms of what you can do with that data.
  - dmurray 3y ago
    More powerful, but mostly you can do good things, like genealogical research, not bad things, like identity fraud or credit card theft (which you could do if you compromised the 7 million accounts individually). It's better for the world that that kind of aggregate data is public where anyone can use it, rather than exploited by 23andMe or sold only through data brokers.

sersi 3y ago

Ah, but then it's not like you get all of the data, just the names that are often fake anyway no? I mean I don't know anyone who used 23 and me under their real name.

bookofjoe 3y ago
>Ah, but then it's not like you get all of the data, just the names that are often fake anyway no? I would bet that an overwhelming majority of 23 and me users do so under their real names. I would bet that an overwhelming majority of HN users who use 23 and me do not do so under their real names.
- sersi 3y ago
  You might be right but even my non-technical 50 years old friend who decided to use 23 and me with her sister to see if they shared the same father, did it with a fake name.