2 ms·
I deliberately cut that from the sentence to focus on the carbon emission part. Which is neglegible. I think the part that improves health and reduces death, i
by berkes 3y ago
I deliberately cut that from the sentence to focus on the carbon emission part.
Which is neglegible. I think the part that improves health and reduces death, is extremely valuable. But important like vaccinations, sewers and food programs are important.
- IanCal 3y ago> Which is neglegible. 2% is not negligible at all. Only 5 countries emit more than 2% of the total, for the rest are all of their emissions negligible? 2% is double the impact of making all international flights carbon zero. It's like making all international shipping carbon neutral. So it's honestly a large result, but not only that it also saves huge numbers of lives, and improves the health of many more. If you want to argue it's a bad thing to do or focus on, you cannot simply ignore "also it saves millions of lives a year".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]