Thank you for the actual testing (and sorry for typos...). Yes, a C version is small because it dynamically links to libc.so in this case, and I meant to compar

Thank you for the actual testing (and sorry for typos...). Yes, a C version is small because it dynamically links to libc.so in this case, and I meant to compare against a statically linked version. I primarily wrote this example as a response to the claim that an equivalent---it isn't---C code with musl is very small.