3 ms·

I think people under and overestimate AI at the same time. E.g. I asked ChatGPT4 to draw me a schematic of a simple buck converter (i.e. 4 components + load). I

I think people under and overestimate AI at the same time. E.g. I asked ChatGPT4 to draw me a schematic of a simple buck converter (i.e. 4 components + load). In the written response it got the basics right. Drawing that schematic is completely garbled non-sense. I was expecting something like this maybe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_converter#/media/File:Buck_conventions.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_converter#/media/File:Buc... I got this: https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq

bobim 3y ago
AI version is so much better!
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
hackerlight 3y ago
Is GPT-4 just passing a prompt to DALL-E to create an image? The garbled diagram makes sense since DALL-E isn't supposed to be that intelligent or an AGI.
- _fizz_buzz_ 3y ago
  Yes it did. And this was the description ChatGPT put underneath it: "Here's the illustration of a basic buck converter schematic. This diagram includes the input voltage source (Vin), the switch (transistor), diode, inductor (L), capacitor (C), output voltage (Vout), and the load (represented as a resistor). The connections between these components and the flow of current are also shown. This should help you understand the basic operation of a buck converter." Which is a pretty good description of the components. However, it then gaslights me into believing this is somehow depicted in the picture Dall-E produced.
  - hackerlight 3y ago
    So even if GPT-4 "understands" what needs to be drawn (in the sense that the higher-level concepts and relations between them are embedded in its weights), it's difficult to get DALL-E to draw it correctly because DALL-E doesn't have that same "understanding". OpenAI will need to combine these models somehow, or train DALL-E so that it has the same conceptual understanding.
Mordisquitos 3y ago
> I got this: https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq Are you sure you asked ChatGPT4 to draw the schematic for a simple buck converter? I'm asking because that looks like a near perfect pre-Schneider coencarbulator-control oblidisk transistor, ingeniously aligned for use with theta arrays! I'm quite out of date with the latest VX work, but it looks impressive enough that I think you should ask the VX community [0] in case any of them may use this design to get improved delta readings. [0] https://old.reddit.com/r/VXJunkies/ https://old.reddit.com/r/VXJunkies/
- _fizz_buzz_ 3y ago
  But that is my point, ChatGPT connected the rockwell retro encabulator[0] in reverse, which will of course make the resonance tank split capacitor bridge oscillate out of sync with the active input bias triodes. This will of course immediately fry the dual-bifet transistor driver stage. Not sure why they call this AI. [0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w

bobim 3y ago

AI version is so much better!

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

hackerlight 3y ago

Is GPT-4 just passing a prompt to DALL-E to create an image? The garbled diagram makes sense since DALL-E isn't supposed to be that intelligent or an AGI.

_fizz_buzz_ 3y ago
Yes it did. And this was the description ChatGPT put underneath it: "Here's the illustration of a basic buck converter schematic. This diagram includes the input voltage source (Vin), the switch (transistor), diode, inductor (L), capacitor (C), output voltage (Vout), and the load (represented as a resistor). The connections between these components and the flow of current are also shown. This should help you understand the basic operation of a buck converter." Which is a pretty good description of the components. However, it then gaslights me into believing this is somehow depicted in the picture Dall-E produced.
- hackerlight 3y ago
  So even if GPT-4 "understands" what needs to be drawn (in the sense that the higher-level concepts and relations between them are embedded in its weights), it's difficult to get DALL-E to draw it correctly because DALL-E doesn't have that same "understanding". OpenAI will need to combine these models somehow, or train DALL-E so that it has the same conceptual understanding.

Mordisquitos 3y ago

> I got this: https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq https://imgur.com/a/tEqprGq Are you sure you asked ChatGPT4 to draw the schematic for a simple buck converter? I'm asking because that looks like a near perfect pre-Schneider coencarbulator-control oblidisk transistor, ingeniously aligned for use with theta arrays! I'm quite out of date with the latest VX work, but it looks impressive enough that I think you should ask the VX community [0] in case any of them may use this design to get improved delta readings. [0] https://old.reddit.com/r/VXJunkies/ https://old.reddit.com/r/VXJunkies/

_fizz_buzz_ 3y ago
But that is my point, ChatGPT connected the rockwell retro encabulator[0] in reverse, which will of course make the resonance tank split capacitor bridge oscillate out of sync with the active input bias triodes. This will of course immediately fry the dual-bifet transistor driver stage. Not sure why they call this AI. [0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w