4 ms·
It's absolutely solvable - and presumably this is the sort of functionality that more legal-specific AI applications offer (probably mixed with some sort of kno
by Closi 3y ago
It's absolutely solvable - and presumably this is the sort of functionality that more legal-specific AI applications offer (probably mixed with some sort of knowledge graph that contains facts).
Seems like the issue here was that a lawyer was just using OOTB ChatGPT.
- tiborsaas 3y agoI'm not so sure with generic LLM-s. With what I've seen so far in how LLM-s work "hallucination" is a feature, not a bug. In other use cases it's called creativity when the user wants new ideas generated or filling in the missing spots. In these cases they are really happy that it can hallucinate, but of course they don't call it like that. So the dilemma is that we need to eliminate the same thing in one case but improve it in others. But I believe you are right that we can engineer a fine tuned system that can use tools to fact check using traditional techniques.