4 ms·
I don't know how else it would be possible but the article is not about people being laid off chaining themselves to theirs desks and refusing to leave the buil
by dizhn 3y ago
I don't know how else it would be possible but the article is not about people being laid off chaining themselves to theirs desks and refusing to leave the building. It's about google "suggesting" them to resign because the law does not allow them to be fired without cause. (This is the case in a lot places outside of the US).
- qwytw 3y ago> law does not allow them to be fired without cause. (This is the case in a lot places outside of the US). Most places have an opt-out if you're reducing headcount (e.g. due to cost cutting measures rather than firing individual employees due to specific or specific reasons)
- dizhn 3y agoYes we have it too. It's not automatically a "just" cause. The workers have the right to sue to be reinstated. That usually nets them 8-12 months of their salary above what they already got as severance. (And severance is not optional either) If they resign though. It's a clean departure. Company pays nothing and can even get paid if the employee does not work in the severance period. Of course in the current case there would be a deal for resigning.
- aitchnyu 3y agoScrew suggested resignations. Common bane in India, where nobody reveals they were let go from their employer.