3 ms·

Nah. They could have taken the time to condense it down to something useful, but nope... they decided to pad it out as far as they could. Pretty sure text gen

• attentionspan 3y ago
  Tbh. I also skipped over parts of the article. But I'm not blaming the author for that.
• pcthrowaway 3y ago
  This is like saying a movie can be condensed into a several-sentence summary of its plot. The author of the article was deliberate with their words. A lot of what you might see as "useless filler" served to humanize all the characters, and give us much greater insight than we would get from a summary. I teared up when I read about Jaile's situation: how his wife left him during his proceedings, and then died of cancer before his name was cleared. And I was inspired by his optimistic attitude in the face of so much injustice. If you want a summary, you're free to copy-paste and ask ChatGPT for one. ChatGPT can't expand a summary into a moving work of investigative journalism while maintaining authenticity.
  • true_religion 3y ago
    At least 11 jurors, a little girls parents, the police force, the judge, the prosecutions office and the defendants own spouse all believed that he was guilty despite having a solod alibi of three unconnected perfect strangers saying he was elsewhere at the time. It’s like everyone failed him. Only his brother believed him.