Saying "By it's nature, who owned what was ambiguous. There was none or no identifying information." seems reasonable given what was reported. In an indictment

Saying "By it's nature, who owned what was ambiguous. There was none or no identifying information." seems reasonable given what was reported. In an indictment against U.S. Private Vaults, Inc., the U.S. attorney for Los Angeles accused the company of marketing itself deliberately to attract criminals, saying it brazenly promoted itself as a place customers could store valuables with confidence that tax authorities would be hard-pressed to learn their identities or what was stored in their locked boxes. To access the facility, customers needed no identification; it took just an eye and hand scan to unlock the door. “We don’t even want to know your name,” it advertised, according to prosecutors. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-04-02/fbi-beverly-hills-vault-search-seizure https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-04-02/fbi-beve...