Given a reply I take to be accurate, > It's more like summary of a 30+ year research program I'd say my comment is essentially correct. It is, indeed, a kind

Given a reply I take to be accurate, > It's more like summary of a 30+ year research program I'd say my comment is essentially correct. It is, indeed, a kind of blog article but summarising a massive research programme, rather than defining one. I didnt speak to the validity or status of the content; I spoke to how odd it is in what's taken to be a journal. No journal (of science) would publish this as it is.