> That's not an answer, that's an argument. Fair enough, and I agree. But there may be no answer in a scientific sense -- testable, falsifiable and so forth.

> That's not an answer, that's an argument. Fair enough, and I agree. But there may be no answer in a scientific sense -- testable, falsifiable and so forth. > Occam's Razor isn't like the second law of thermodynamics. It's a heuristic. Yes, true, but it's not meant to force a conclusion, only offer guidance, which might be entirely wrong at times.