No, the reason it's bad is that it's 100% non-sequitur. There's no reason to even consider further evidence before dismissing it. Other commenters have pointed

No, the reason it's bad is that it's 100% non-sequitur. There's no reason to even consider further evidence before dismissing it. Other commenters have pointed out that this is basically a parody article, which is the only way it makes sense. But that means anyone who thinks it represents the pinnacle of science has eaten the onion and needs to reevaluate their criteria for scientific work.